An Empirical Study on the Smallest Comfortable Button/Icon Size on Touch Screen
学科主题工业与组织心理学
Xianghong Sun1; Tom Plocher2; Weina Qu1
2007
出处Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture
其他责任者Nuray Aykin
页码615-621
出版者Springer Berlin Heidelberg
出版地Berlin
关键词touch screen button size
产权排序1
英文摘要For the convenience of firefighters’ decision-making and operation, touch screen display was chosen as the preferred interface for a fire information display system. Few studies were conducted to determine comfortable button/icon size on touch screens. This experiment investigated the effect of four factors on operators’ performance with touch screen: 1) button size (20*20, 30*30, 40*40, and 50*50 pixels 2), spacing between buttons (0, 5, 10, and 20 pixels), 3) button/icon types (digit buttons only, picture icons only, combination), and 4) glove wearing (wearing vs. not wearing). 14 males were asked to accomplish a series of matching tasks on touch screen with the forefinger of right hand. Results showed that the spacing between buttons/icons, and wearing or not wearing a glove did not affect performance. Subjects pointed to the digit buttons faster than the other two kinds of buttons/icons. There was a significant difference among button/icon sizes. People performed best when it was equal to or bigger than 40*40 pixels.
内容类型专著章节, 文集论文
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/14275]  
专题心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
作者单位1.State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Inst. of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
2.Honeywell ACS Labs, Minneapolis MN 55418, USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Xianghong Sun,Tom Plocher,Weina Qu. An Empirical Study on the Smallest Comfortable Button/Icon Size on Touch Screen. 2007.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace