Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double-Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation | |
Wang HW(王洪伟)1,2,3; Yuan, Hong3; Yu HL(于海龙)3; Li CQ(李长青)1; Zhou Y(周跃)1; Xiang LB(项良碧)3 | |
刊名 | ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY |
2022 | |
页码 | 1-10 |
关键词 | Guide tube Large lumbar disc herniation Minimally invasive Open lumbar discectomy Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy |
ISSN号 | 1757-7853 |
产权排序 | 2 |
英文摘要 | Objective To compare the effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) using a double-cannula guide tube (DGT), traditional PELD, and open lumbar discectomy (OLD) to treat large lumbar disc herniations (LLDHs). Methods Seventy patients who presented with LLDH without cauda equina syndrome and were treated with surgery in our hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were included. The detailed index included the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and radicular leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the immediate preoperative period and at the final follow-up. The operation time, radiation exposure time, surgical satisfaction rate, and modified MacNab criteria score were also recorded. Results The leg and back pain of the patients in these groups improved significantly in the postoperative period. No significant differences were observed in leg pain improvement between the other two groups; however, patients in the PELD group (with or without DGT) presented with significantly higher improvement in back pain than the OLD group (t = 9.965, p < 0.001). The final ODI scores were 12.1 +/- 4.9, 11.2 +/- 2.9, and 16.4 +/- 3.6 in the PELD, PELD-DGT, and OLD groups, respectively. Patients in the PELD and PELD-DGT groups presented with significantly lower postoperative ODI scores than those in the OLD group (t = 20.834, p < 0.001). The mean postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the PELD group and PELD with DGT group than in the OLD group (t = 46.688, p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the PELD-DGT group than those in the PELD group (t = 25.281, p = 0.001). No perioperative complications were observed in either group. Based on the modified MacNab criteria, excellent and good outcomes were achieved in 20 out of 21 patients (95.2%) in the PELD group, 23 out of 24 patients (95.8%) in the PELD-DGT group, and 22 out of 25 patients (88.0%) in the OLD group. The rates of excellent and good outcomes were higher in the PELD and PELD-DGT groups than in the OLD group, but there were no significant differences (chi(2) = 1.454, p = 0.835). Conclusions PELD using DGT is a safe and effective option for LLDH and features advantages such as improvements in back pain, a lower hospitalization cost than OLD, a shorter operation time, and less fluoroscopy than traditional PELD. |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000805082100001 |
资助机构 | Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019-ZD-1063] ; Shenyang Science and Technology Project [21-173-9-70] |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.sia.cn/handle/173321/31038] |
专题 | 沈阳自动化研究所_机器人学研究室 |
通讯作者 | Wang HW(王洪伟); Li CQ(李长青) |
作者单位 | 1.Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, the ArmyMedical University, Chongqing, China 2.State Key Laboratory of Robotics,Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang 3.Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of Chinese PLA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wang HW,Yuan, Hong,Yu HL,et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double-Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY,2022:1-10. |
APA | Wang HW,Yuan, Hong,Yu HL,Li CQ,Zhou Y,&Xiang LB.(2022).Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double-Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY,1-10. |
MLA | Wang HW,et al."Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using a Double-Cannula Guide Tube for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation".ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2022):1-10. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论