A method for assessing the impacts of an international agreement on regional progress towards Sustainable Development Goals | |
Huan, Yizhong1,2,3; Yu, Yurong3; Liang, Tao1,2; Burgman, Mark3 | |
刊名 | SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT |
2021-09-01 | |
卷号 | 785页码:11 |
关键词 | Sustainable Development Goals International agreement Impact assessment Policy evaluation Difference-in-differences Belt and road initiative |
ISSN号 | 0048-9697 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147336 |
通讯作者 | Liang, Tao(liangt@igsnrr.ac.cn) |
英文摘要 | In 2015, 193 countries committed to 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG/SDGs). Assessing the impacts of policies or actions on SDGs can help countries to improve actions towards achieving SDGs. There is a need for quantitative methods for assessing the impacts of international agreements on regional SDGs. To fill this research gap, we constructed a composite methodological framework, including a difference-in-differences (DID) model (based on the interactions between SDGs), a lag-effects model and a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) model. Specifically, the DID and lag-effects models were used to analyze the basic effects of the agreement and the effects lag period. The DDD model was used to analyze the impacts of heterogeneity among countries on the outcomes of the agreement. We aim to construct a general methodological framework that can assess the impacts of an agreement on any one SDG. To test this method empirically, we chose the & ldquo;Belt and Road & rdquo; Initiative (BRI) and assessed its effects on SDG 1 (no poverty), evaluating data from 20 countries, 15 of which participated in the BRI. The empirical results showed that SDG 1 exhibits spatial agglomeration and spillover effects, and the impacts of BRI may be underestimated if the spatial characteristics are not considered. The BRI appears to promote SDG 1 in 15 participating countries, but the effects have a 2-year lag. The positive effects of BRI on SDG 1 are most pronounced in the 12 upper -middle-and high-income countries among the 15 participating countries. Finally, we analyzed the advantages and limitations of the methodological framework. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
资助项目 | Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[XDA20010301] ; State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council[202004910544] |
WOS关键词 | QUASI-NATURAL EXPERIMENT ; FAST-FOOD INDUSTRY ; ECONOMIC-GROWTH ; MINIMUM-WAGES ; NEW-JERSEY ; CHINA ; EMPLOYMENT ; EMISSIONS ; POLICY ; POLLUTION |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
语种 | 英语 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000659454800016 |
资助机构 | Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ; State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/164152] |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Liang, Tao |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Huan, Yizhong,Yu, Yurong,Liang, Tao,et al. A method for assessing the impacts of an international agreement on regional progress towards Sustainable Development Goals[J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,2021,785:11. |
APA | Huan, Yizhong,Yu, Yurong,Liang, Tao,&Burgman, Mark.(2021).A method for assessing the impacts of an international agreement on regional progress towards Sustainable Development Goals.SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,785,11. |
MLA | Huan, Yizhong,et al."A method for assessing the impacts of an international agreement on regional progress towards Sustainable Development Goals".SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 785(2021):11. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论