Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China
Pan, Ying3; Wu, Junxi1,3; Zhang, Yanjie2; Zhang, Xianzhou1,3; Yu, Chengqun1,3
刊名ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
2021-04-01
卷号48页码:8
关键词Cost?benefit analysis Ecosystem services Grasslands Land-use simulation Subsidy Tibet
ISSN号2212-0416
DOI10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101254
通讯作者Pan, Ying(panying@igsnrr.ac.cn) ; Wu, Junxi(wujx@igsnrr.ac.cn)
英文摘要Restrictions on stakeholders? utilization of ecosystems and associated subsidies are commonly used to simulta-neously enhance ecosystem conservation and poverty reduction. However, methodologies identifying adjust-ments to subsidy policies that produce more effective conservation approaches are lacking. In this study, we integrated cost?benefit analysis and land-use modeling to simulate changes in grassland use under different subsidy scenarios. Subsequently, we analyzed the effects of changes in subsidy policies on ecosystem services and household income using two new indices. The results showed that annually planted and mowed grassland was 21 times more economically profitable than natural grazed grassland, although its ecosystem services were of lower value. Fencing grassland resulted in economic and ecological profits, although their extent depended on the types of subsidies provided. Average capital-use efficiency under the interest-free loan scenario was considerably higher than that under the cash subsidy scenario, and thus the former was economically advantageous. From the perspective of ecosystem services benefits, capital efficiency was positive under the cash subsidy scenario but negative under the interest-free loan scenario. The results suggest that on the one hand, cash subsidies are effective in providing economic compensation for poor households, reducing poverty and supporting ecosystem conservation while releasing household labor for part-time urban employment. On the other hand, interest-free loans provide households with the initial capital necessary to commence forage production and subsequently provide employment. Therefore, simultaneously providing cash subsidies and interest-free loans could achieve a win?win outcome, whereby the ecosystem is conserved and household income is increased while limiting the government?s financial burden.
资助项目Edanz Group China ; National Key Research and Development Program of China[2016YFC0502004] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[31971560] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[31570460]
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种英语
出版者ELSEVIER
WOS记录号WOS:000632480900001
资助机构Edanz Group China ; National Key Research and Development Program of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/161656]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Pan, Ying; Wu, Junxi
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modelling, Lhasa Plateau Ecosyst Res Stn, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Dali Univ, Coll Agr & Biol Sci, Dali 671003, Peoples R China
3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Pan, Ying,Wu, Junxi,Zhang, Yanjie,et al. Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China[J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES,2021,48:8.
APA Pan, Ying,Wu, Junxi,Zhang, Yanjie,Zhang, Xianzhou,&Yu, Chengqun.(2021).Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China.ECOSYSTEM SERVICES,48,8.
MLA Pan, Ying,et al."Simultaneous enhancement of ecosystem services and poverty reduction through adjustments to subsidy policies relating to grassland use in Tibet, China".ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 48(2021):8.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace