Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139847

	Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs
	Liu, Moucheng 1,2; Chen, Cheng 3; Yang, Lun 1,2; Min, Qingwen 1,2,4; Xiong, Ying 5
刊名	SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
	2020-11-01
卷号	741 页码:8
关键词	Payment for ecosystem services (PES) Planting decision model Hani rice terraces
ISSN号	0048-9697
DOI	10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139847
通讯作者	Min, Qingwen(minqw@igsnrr.ac.cn)
英文摘要	The eco-compensation targeting agricultural non-point source pollution is considered to have a positive role in the farmland environment. However, the effect depends on how the farmers respond and implement the policies. This paper aimed to understand whether the agricultural eco-compensation changes the farmers' planting decision and to what extent it affects the input of chemicals. Taking World Heritage, Hani Terraces in southwest China as an example, this paper established a multi-objective production decision model for farmers to analyze the impact of different compensation standards on farmers' planting decisions and welfare. The results showed that, when the eco-compensation standard is relatively low, farmers tend to adopt the planting structure with higher income to make up for the loss caused by reducing chemicals input. With the increase of ecocompensation standard, the input intensity of chemicals (per unit area) continues to decrease. However, the total amount of chemical inputs increases first and then decreases as the planting structure changes. That means, agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical input. The results show the importance to pay attention to the behavior changes when eco-compensation is designed and implemented and will have a positive effect on the sustainability of the eco-compensation policy. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
资助项目	China National Key Research and Development Plan Project[2017YFC0506402] ; China National Natural Science Foundation[41201586]
WOS关键词	ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ; PAYMENTS ; CONSERVATION ; POLICY ; IMPLEMENTATION ; PARTICIPATION ; OUTCOMES ; SYSTEMS ; WATER
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种	英语
出版者	ELSEVIER
WOS记录号	WOS:000568816800007
资助机构	China National Key Research and Development Plan Project ; China National Natural Science Foundation
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/156869]
专题	中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者	Min, Qingwen
作者单位	1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Leihniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany 4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 5.Rerimin Univ China, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Beijing 100086, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Liu, Moucheng,Chen, Cheng,Yang, Lun,et al. Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs[J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,2020,741:8.
APA	Liu, Moucheng,Chen, Cheng,Yang, Lun,Min, Qingwen,&Xiong, Ying.(2020).Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs.SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,741,8.
MLA	Liu, Moucheng,et al."Agricultural eco-compensation may not necessarily reduce chemical inputs".SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 741(2020):8.