Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer | |
Ren, Juan; Yuan, Wei; Wang, Ruihua; Wang, Qiuping; Li, Yi; Xue, Chaofan; Yan, Yanli; Ma, Xiaowei; Tan, Li; Liu, Zi | |
刊名 | PLOS ONE |
2016 | |
卷号 | 11 |
ISSN号 | 1932-6203 |
URL标识 | 查看原文 |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
URI标识 | http://www.corc.org.cn/handle/1471x/2963803 |
专题 | 西安交通大学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ren, Juan,Yuan, Wei,Wang, Ruihua,et al. Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer[J]. PLOS ONE,2016,11. |
APA | Ren, Juan.,Yuan, Wei.,Wang, Ruihua.,Wang, Qiuping.,Li, Yi.,...&Liu, Zi.(2016).Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer.PLOS ONE,11. |
MLA | Ren, Juan,et al."Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer".PLOS ONE 11(2016). |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论