Multiomics analysis profile acute liver injury module clusters to compare the therapeutic efficacy of bifendate and muaddil sapra
Talifu, A (Talifu, Ainiwaer)[ 1,2,3,4 ]; Saimaiti, R (Saimaiti, Refuhati)[ 3 ]; Maitinuer, Y (Maitinuer, Yusufu)[ 3 ]; Liu, GY (Liu, Geyu)[ 1,2 ]; Abudureyimu, M (Abudureyimu, Miernisha)[ 1,2,3,4 ]; Xin, XL (Xin, Xuelei)[ 1,2 ]
刊名SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
2019
卷号9期号::4335页码:1-10
ISSN号2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-019-40356-5
英文摘要

The pathogenesis of acute liver injury has been plagued by biologists and physicians. We know little about its therapeutic mechanism. Therefore, this study explored the mechanism of bifendate and muaddil sapra in the treatment of acute liver injury. Firstly, co-expression and cluster analysis of disease-related genes were carried out, and the Go function and KEGG pathway of modules and related genes were identified. Secondly, pivot analysis of modules can identify key regulators. On the other hand, based on the acute liver injury induced by CCl4, we use the combined analysis of proteomics and transcriptome to find therapeutic targets and related mechanisms of drugs. A total of 21 dysfunction modules were obtained, which were significantly involved in immune system, hepatitis and other related functions and pathways. Transcriptome analysis showed 117 targets for bifendate treatment, while 119 for muaddil sapra. Through exploring the mechanism, we found that the two drugs could modulate the module genes. Moreover, bifendate regulate the dysfunction module through ncRNA (SNORD43 and RNU11). Muaddil sapra can mediate dysfunction modules not only by regulating ncRNA (PRIM2 and PIP5K1B), but also by regulating TF (STAT1 and IRF8), thus having a wider therapeutic potential. On the other hand, proteome analysis showed that bifendate mainly regulated Rac2, Fermt3 and Plg, while muaddil sapra mainly regulated Sqle and Stat1. In addition, muaddil sapra regulates less metabolic related proteins to make them more effective. Overall, this study not only provides basic theory for further study of the complex pathogenesis of acute liver injury, but also provides valuable reference for clinical use of bifendate and muaddil sapra in the treatment of acute liver injury.

WOS记录号WOS:000461018600004
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.xjipc.cas.cn/handle/365002/5709]  
专题新疆理化技术研究所_省部共建新疆特有药用资源利用重点实验室
新疆理化技术研究所_资源化学研究室
通讯作者Xin, XL (Xin, Xuelei)[ 1,2 ]
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Tech Inst Phys & Chem, State Key Lab Basis Xinjiang Indigenous Med Plant, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
2.Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Tech Inst Phys & Chem, Key Lab Plant Resources & Chem Arid Zone, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
3.Hosp Xinjiang Tradit Uighur Med, Urumqi 830001, Peoples R China
4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Talifu, A ,Saimaiti, R ,Maitinuer, Y ,et al. Multiomics analysis profile acute liver injury module clusters to compare the therapeutic efficacy of bifendate and muaddil sapra[J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS,2019,9(:4335):1-10.
APA Talifu, A ,Saimaiti, R ,Maitinuer, Y ,Liu, GY ,Abudureyimu, M ,&Xin, XL .(2019).Multiomics analysis profile acute liver injury module clusters to compare the therapeutic efficacy of bifendate and muaddil sapra.SCIENTIFIC REPORTS,9(:4335),1-10.
MLA Talifu, A ,et al."Multiomics analysis profile acute liver injury module clusters to compare the therapeutic efficacy of bifendate and muaddil sapra".SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 9.:4335(2019):1-10.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace