QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	巴尔米拉环礁禁渔案：基于征收条款的分析; Takings Clause Analysis on the Fishery Closure Case in the Palmyra Atoll
	Owen Tang
	2009-12-30
关键词	巴尔米拉环礁 The Palmyra Atoll 专属经济区 Exclusive economic zone 美国宪法第五修正案的征收条款 Fifth Amendment Takings Clause under the US Constitution 管制征收 Regulatory taking 商业捕鱼投资 Investment in commercial fishery
英文摘要	Owen Tang，法学博士，香港理工大学物流及航运学系海商法教员。; 【中文摘要】商业捕鱼需要大量的金融投资，且利益相关者的收益可能受到后续政府禁止商业捕鱼法规的负面影响。2001年，美国内政部颁布了禁止在巴尔米拉环礁商业捕鱼的法规，投资者基于美国宪法第五修正案的征收条款起诉联邦政府，内政部在美国上诉法院赢得了该项诉讼。本文作者回顾了征收条款的法律原则，特别强调了有关渔业经营的案例，得出的结论认为，2009年的巴尔米拉环礁 案为考虑大规模投资商业捕鱼设施的人们带来了令人胆寒的信号。 【Abstract】Commercial fishery requires heavy financial investments, and stakeholders' benefits can be negatively affected by subsequent government regulations on closure of commercial fishery. In 2001, the US Department of the Interior issued a regulation on closure of commercial fishery in the Palmyra Atoll, and the investor sued the federal government based on the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause under the US Constitution. The Interior Department won the case in the US Court of Appeals. The author conducts a review on the legal principles about the Takings Clause, with particular emphasis on cases related to fishery operation. The author concludes that the 2009 Palmyra Atoll case provides a chilling message to those considering major investment in commercial fishing facilities.
语种	中文
出版者	《中国海洋法学评论》编辑部
内容类型	其他
源URL	[http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/handle/2288/98198]
专题	2009年卷第2期(Vol.2009 No.2)
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Owen Tang. 巴尔米拉环礁禁渔案：基于征收条款的分析, Takings Clause Analysis on the Fishery Closure Case in the Palmyra Atoll. 2009-12-30.

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。