九孔鲍摄食江蓠与人工配合饵料的能量收支比较

CORC > 集美大学

	九孔鲍摄食江蓠与人工配合饵料的能量收支比较
	阎希柱 ; 王桂忠 ; 李少菁 ; 林声盼 ; 吴成业
刊名	http://epub.edu.cnki.net/grid2008/brief/detailj.aspx?filename=yyhs200406016&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFQ2004
	2012-06-05 ; 2012-06-05
关键词	能量收支九孔鲍人工配合饵料江蓠(图1表4参21) energy budget Haliotis diverscicolor aquatilis formula feed Gracilariaceae licheniodes (Fig 1, Tab 4, Ref 21) S968.3
其他题名	ENERGY BUDGETS OF HALIOTIS DIVERSCICOLOR AQUATILIS FED BY GRACILARIACEAE LICHENIODES AND FORMULA FEED
中文摘要	通过投喂江蓠 (Gracilariaceaelicheniodes)和配合饵料对九孔鲍 (Haliotisdiversicoloraquatilis)的能量收支进行了比较研究 .结果表明 :两种饲料组的九孔鲍耗氧率在昼夜之间均并没有明显差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,九孔鲍摄食两种饵料的吸收率也没有显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,而饵料系数、蛋白质效率、总生长效率则有显著的差异 (P <0 .0 5 ) .配合饵料组的排泄能显著高于江篱组的 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而代谢能和粘液能却显著低于江篱组的 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,两组饲料的排粪能和壳能没有显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) .因壳能很少 ,在测定中可以忽略 .配合饵料组的软体部生长能显著高于江篱组的 (P <0 .0 5 ) .摄食江蓠和配合饵料的九孔鲍能量收支方程分别为 :江蓠组10 0C =(12 .76± 1.2 2 )F +(76 .4 7± 5 .33)R +(2 .74± 0 .4 0 )U +(6 .75± 0 .4 6 )M +(2 .78± 0 .4 8)Pg+(0 .0 3±0 .0 1)Psh- (1.5 3± 4 .19)配合饵料组10 0C =(12 .15± 1.6 9)F +(5 4 .94± 5 .10 )R +(4.5 0± 0 .70 )U +(3.99± 0 .0 7)M +(2 9.79± 4 .77)Pg+(0 .0 3±0 .0 1)Psh- (5 .4 0± 7.4 3); The energy budgets of Haliotis diverscicolor aquatilis fed by Gracilariaceae licheniodes and formula feed were studied in this paper. There was no significantly different diurnal oxygen consumption rate of H. diversicolor aquatilis between the two groups (P>0.05). The absorption efficiency of the two feeds groups was not significantly different (P>0.05), while the feed coefficient,protein efficiency ratio,gross growth efficiency were significantly different (P<0.05). Although the excretion energy of the formula feed group was significantly higher than that of G. licheniodes group (P<0.05), the metabolic energy and mucus energy of the formula feed were significantly lower than those of G. licheniodes group (P<0.05). The feces energy and the shell growth energy of the two groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). The shell growth energy was so low that it can be neglected. So the somatic part growth energy of the formula feed was significantly higher than that of G. licheniodes group (P<0.05). The energy equations of H. diverscicolor aquatilis fed by G. licheniodes (the former) and formula feed (the latter) were: 100C=(12.76±1.22)F+(76.47±5.33)R+(2.74±0.40)U+(6.75±0.46)M+(2.78±0.48) P g+(0.03± 0.01) P sh-(1.53±4.19) 100C=(12.15±1.69)F+(54.94±5.10)R+(4.50±0.70)U+(3.99±0.07)M+(29.79±4.77)P g+(0.03± 0.01) P sh-(5.40±7.43); 【作者单位】集美大学水产学院；厦门大学海洋与环境学院；集美大学水产学院福建厦门361021厦门大学海洋与环境学院福建厦门361005；福建厦门361005；福建厦门361021；福建厦门361021；【作者英文名】YAN Xizhu 1,2**, WANG Guizhong 2, LI Shaojing 2, LIN Shengpan 1 & WU Chengye 1 ( 1Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China) ( 2Oceanography and Environment College, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China)
语种	中文
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.calis.edu.cn/hdl/235041/12541]
专题	集美大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	阎希柱,王桂忠,李少菁,等. 九孔鲍摄食江蓠与人工配合饵料的能量收支比较[J]. http://epub.edu.cnki.net/grid2008/brief/detailj.aspx?filename=yyhs200406016&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFQ2004,2012, 2012.
APA	阎希柱,王桂忠,李少菁,林声盼,&吴成业.(2012).九孔鲍摄食江蓠与人工配合饵料的能量收支比较.http://epub.edu.cnki.net/grid2008/brief/detailj.aspx?filename=yyhs200406016&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFQ2004.
MLA	阎希柱,et al."九孔鲍摄食江蓠与人工配合饵料的能量收支比较".http://epub.edu.cnki.net/grid2008/brief/detailj.aspx?filename=yyhs200406016&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFQ2004 (2012).