QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	在延续与断裂之间——驳吉登斯对历史唯物主义的批判
	王峰明 ; Wang Fengming
	2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30
关键词	延续性 断裂性 历史唯物主义 吉登斯 马克思 XiWeiGuo Taiyuan commandery Henei commandery thirty-two towns B03
其他题名	Between Continuing and Splitting: a Refutation of Anthony Giddens' Criticism on Historical Materialism
中文摘要	吉登斯对历史唯物主义的批判的观点是值得反驳的,不能把《形态》与《形式》割裂开来,认为前者是延续主义的历史观,后者则是延续主义和断裂主义的并存。不能把资本主义社会和此前的非资本主义社会割裂开来,认为前者是阶级社会,后者则是阶级分化社会;只有在前者那里,私有财产才是重要的,阶级关系和阶级剥削才侵入到生产过程中,经济和政治才出现制度性分离。不能把社会历史发展的延续性和断裂性割裂开来,既不存在无断裂的延续,也不存在无延续的断裂,坚持延续性和断裂性的辩证统一是历史唯物主义一以贯之的基本原则和立场。; As a response to Giddens' criticism of historical materialism, this paper pointed out that we must not split the ‘ Form' from the ‘ German Ideology', and think that a continuous history view appeared in the latter,while another view of both continuous and discontinuous history appeared in the former. We must not separate capitalist society from all non-capitalist societies previous to it, and think that the former is a class society,while the latter are some class-divided societies. Only in the former, private property is important, because in which class relations and processes of class exploitation intrude into the nature of the labor process, and an in-stitutional separation of economy from politics occurs. And we must not separate discontinuity from continuity in the development of social history, for there does not exist continuity which has no discontinuity, nor exists dis-continuity which has no continuity. It is the basic and unchanged principle and stand of historical materialism to stick to a dialectical unity between continuity and discontinuity.
语种	中文 ; 中文
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/146141]
专题	清华大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	王峰明,Wang Fengming. 在延续与断裂之间——驳吉登斯对历史唯物主义的批判[J],2016, 2016.
APA	王峰明,&Wang Fengming.(2016).在延续与断裂之间——驳吉登斯对历史唯物主义的批判..
MLA	王峰明,et al."在延续与断裂之间——驳吉登斯对历史唯物主义的批判".(2016).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。