| 论虚假诉讼:兼评我国第三人撤销诉讼实践 | |
| 任重 ; Ren Zhong | |
| 2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30 | |
| 关键词 | 虚假诉讼 第三人撤销诉讼 裁判作用方式 另行起诉 既判力 traditional ethnic festivals the rest right legal attributes D925.1 |
| 其他题名 | On False Lawsuit: On the basis of the Practices of Abatement of Action by the Third Party |
| 中文摘要 | 虚假诉讼法律成因及对策分析不仅对确定《民事诉讼法》第56条第3款结果条件有决定意义,更对民事诉讼的体系结构调整有重要参考价值。以生效裁判对案外第三人合法权益构成的侵害为标准,法律意义上的虚假诉讼只存在于合同被撤销后虚假诉讼当事人回复所有权、协议不成时请求法院分割共有财产以及因虚假诉讼致使案外第三人无法另行诉讼三种情形。对民事裁判作用方式的误读、对另行起诉制度的忽视以及既判力制度的缺失构成虚假诉讼的根本法律成因,只有对以上问题作出实质回应,才能根本解决虚假诉讼问题。; The analysis on the legal cause of false lawsuit and its solution plays a very important role for confirming the conditions of consequence under article 56( 3) of the Civil Procedure Law, and adjusting the architecture of civil procedure. According to the relationship between final decision and legal damage of the third party out of the lawsuit,the false lawsuit in the legal sense can be limited to three groups,which are the revocation of the contract,the partition of a commonly owned real property or movable property if no agreement is reached,and the obstacle of a new lawsuit for the third party out of the lawsuit. The misunderstanding for the operation of the final decision,the disregard of the new process for the third party out of the lawsuit and the absence of so-called Materielle Rechtskraft should be considered for the most important legal cause of false lawsuit. The solution of false lawsuit depends on the improvement of those defects in Chinese Civil Procedure. |
| 语种 | 中文 ; 中文 |
| 内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/142998]  |
| 专题 | 清华大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 任重,Ren Zhong. 论虚假诉讼:兼评我国第三人撤销诉讼实践[J],2016, 2016. |
| APA | 任重,&Ren Zhong.(2016).论虚假诉讼:兼评我国第三人撤销诉讼实践.. |
| MLA | 任重,et al."论虚假诉讼:兼评我国第三人撤销诉讼实践".(2016). |
| 个性服务 |
| 查看访问统计 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论